Wisconsin judge arrested, accused of shielding immigrant from federal agents
FBI agents arrested a Milwaukee County judge on Friday on charges of obstructing immigration agents, saying she steered an immigrant through a side door in her courtroom while the agents waited to arrest him in a public hallway.
The decision to charge a sitting state court judge is a major escalation in the Trump administration’s battle with local authorities over deportations. The administration has demanded, under threat of investigation or prosecution, that local officials not impede federal efforts to deport millions of immigrants in the country illegally. The arrest sent a message that the administration intends to take a harder line with those who do.
The arrest of Judge Hannah C. Dugan comes after months of rising tensions between the Trump administration and the judiciary. President Donald Trump and his top advisers have repeatedly assailed “local judges” for halting or questioning actions taken by the administration, particularly when it comes to immigration cases.
Trump’s drive to round up and deport large numbers of migrants has also led to other disputes with federal judges, especially over his use of the Alien Enemies Act to send Venezuelans out of the country.
In the Milwaukee case, charging documents described a confrontation last Friday at Dugan’s courthouse, in which federal agents said she was “visibly upset and had a confrontational, angry demeanor” when a group of immigration, drug and FBI agents came to apprehend Eduardo Flores-Ruiz, a citizen of Mexico who was in her courtroom to face domestic violence charges.
According to the criminal complaint, Dugan confronted the agents and told them to talk to the chief judge of the courthouse. She then returned to her courtroom.
“Despite having been advised of the administrative warrant for the arrest of Flores-Ruiz, Judge Dugan then escorted Flores-Ruiz and his counsel out of the courtroom through the ‘jury door,’ which leads to a nonpublic area of the courthouse,” said the complaint, which was written by an FBI agent.
A Drug Enforcement Administration agent spotted Flores-Ruiz leaving the building and notified his colleagues, according to the complaint. Agents approached him on the street outside the courthouse. “A foot chase ensued,” the complaint said. “The agents pursued Flores-Ruiz for the entire length of the courthouse” before catching and arresting him, the complaint said.
The judge was charged with obstructing a proceeding of a federal agency and concealing an individual to prevent his discovery and arrest. After a brief appearance as a defendant in federal court in Milwaukee, which unfolded about a mile from her own courthouse, Dugan was released on her own recognizance.
In a statement, the judge’s defense team said she would fight the charges.
“Judge Dugan will defend herself vigorously, and looks forward to being exonerated,” the statement said, adding that she had hired Steven Biskupic, a former U.S. attorney, to represent her. “Judge Hannah C. Dugan has committed herself to the rule of law and the principles of due process for her entire career as a lawyer and a judge.”
The bureau arrested Dugan on suspicion that she “intentionally misdirected federal agents,” FBI Director Kash Patel wrote on social media Friday before the charges were unsealed.
On Friday night, Patel posted on social media a picture of the judge in handcuffs shortly after her arrest.
David Crowley, the Milwaukee County executive, criticized the FBI’s handling of the case.
“It is clear that the FBI is politicizing this situation to make an example of her and others across the country who oppose their attack on the judicial system and our nation’s immigration laws,” he said in a statement.
Wisconsin Gov. Tony Evers, a Democrat, also raised concerns about how the Trump administration was treating judges.
“Unfortunately, we have seen in recent months the president and the Trump administration repeatedly use dangerous rhetoric to attack and attempt to undermine our judiciary at every level,” Evers said, “including flat-out disobeying the highest court in the land and threatening to impeach and remove judges who do not rule in their favor.”
Attorney General Pam Bondi defended the arrest of the judge, telling Fox News that when someone obstructs justice by “escorting a criminal defendant out a back door, it will not be tolerated.”
“It doesn’t matter who you are, you’re going to be prosecuted,” Bondi said.
Bondi also discussed the recent arrest of a former judge in New Mexico who was charged with obstruction over harboring a person federal agents said was a Venezuelan gang member.
“Some of these judges think they’re above the law. They are not,” she said. “We will come after you and prosecute you. We will find you.”
Christopher A. Wellborn, president of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, reacted with alarm to the judge’s arrest, saying American democracy “rests upon the independence of the judiciary.”
“Retaliatory action from the executive branch that appears to undermine this foundation demands our unwavering scrutiny and a resounding response,” he added.
The chief judge in Milwaukee County, Carl Ashley, said in a statement that Dugan’s caseload would be handled by another jurist in the courthouse and declined to comment further.
The Trump administration has vowed to investigate and prosecute local officials who do not assist federal immigration enforcement efforts, denouncing what they call “sanctuary cities” for not doing more to assist federal apprehensions and deportations of millions of immigrants who lack legal status.
There is no precise legal definition for a sanctuary city, but the term generally refers to places where local governments put limits on how much they will assist federal authorities with deportation efforts. While disagreements about immigration enforcement are often political and policy fights, there are also significant differences in federal and local laws that contribute to the different approaches.
At the Justice Department, senior officials have urged prosecutors to look for cases in which local authorities, whether they are municipal, state or court officials, have tried to stop or hinder immigration agents.
The Milwaukee case involves a frequent flashpoint in that debate, when immigration agents try to arrest immigrants who are appearing in state court. Local authorities often chafe at such efforts, arguing they endanger public safety if people dealing with relatively minor legal issues feel it is unsafe to enter courthouses.
The charging papers against Dugan suggested she had been incensed to learn that immigration agents were in the courthouse and had called it “absurd,” according to one witness.
At first, the judge asked the immigration agent if he was in the courthouse for a hearing, and when the agent said no, the judge “stated that the agent ‘would need to leave the courthouse,’” according to the complaint.
Dugan then asked the agent if they were in possession of a judicial warrant, to which the agent replied no, it was an administrative warrant, according to the complaint. ICE typically uses administrative warrants, which are issued by the agency to apprehend people.
Such warrants do not carry the same authority as a warrant issued by a judge, meaning that people in their homes typically don’t need to open their doors to immigration agents in possession of only an administrative warrant.
In the first Trump administration, a local Massachusetts judge was indicted on federal charges of obstructing immigration authorities. The charges were dropped after the judge agreed to refer herself to potential judicial discipline.
That case also involved allegations that a judge had allowed a defendant being sought by ICE agents to leave the building via a back door in order to avoid detention. The Massachusetts Judicial Conduct Commission has filed formal disciplinary charges against Judge Shelley Joseph. She has denied wrongdoing.
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
Copyright 2025
This story was originally published April 25, 2025 at 11:07 AM